Read Any NDA in Plain English — Free

Yes, with an honest scope. @vustbot (VUST's general multi-model AI chat) will read an NDA you paste right now and explain it in plain English, completely free, no card, no signup beyond opening Telegram. That single-document read works today. A dedicated NDA-specific analyzer — one that automatically checks mutual-vs-one-way direction, flags unusual duration, and scores non-solicit scope every time the same way — is not a separate VUST bot yet. The waitlist button here is a real vote for that dedicated version.

NDAs are short but pattern-heavy: the same handful of variables — direction (mutual or one-way), confidentiality duration, how broadly 'Confidential Information' is defined, and whether a non-solicit or non-compete clause got attached — decide whether a given NDA is standard or unusually restrictive. A general contract reviewer has to handle dozens of clause types; a dedicated NDA analyzer would specialize in exactly these few variables and get better at spotting when one is out of line with the norm. That's the version this page is a demand vote for — see also our general /ai-contract-reviewer page for contracts beyond NDAs.

The variables that repeat across almost every NDA dispute: whether the agreement is mutual or one-sided, a confidentiality term that's longer than typical for the relationship type, a definition of confidential information broad enough to cover public or already-known information, missing standard carve-outs (independently developed info, legally compelled disclosure), and non-solicit or non-compete language reaching further than a plain secrecy agreement usually needs to.

We're not pre-committing to a price before the tool exists — that would be a promise we can't verify. What we can say honestly: reading a pasted NDA in @vustbot is free today, and any dedicated version would be announced with clear, upfront pricing before it ships, not a bait-and-switch after the fact.

No. It's a first-pass reading aid — plain-English orientation on what an NDA says and which clauses look unusual — not legal advice and not a substitute for a lawyer. For anything high-stakes (a real dispute, a large deal, an NDA tied to a court case), have a qualified lawyer review it. Use the free read to walk in informed, not to skip a lawyer where one is genuinely warranted.

Same honesty, narrower target. /ai-contract-reviewer covers any contract type — services agreements, leases, terms-of-service — with a general risk-flag pass. This page is specifically about NDAs, the single most common 'sign this before we talk' document, and the checklist a dedicated NDA analyzer would specialize in (direction, duration, definition breadth, non-solicit scope). Both point at the same waitlist today; if built, they may become two distinct dedicated flows.