AI Search Visibility / Free Audit

Free GEO Audit: Is Your Page Visible to AI?

Paste a URL into @vustSEObot on Telegram and get a mechanical audit of whether ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude and Gemini can actually read and cite your page — six verifiable checks, plus AI-suggested fixes. No signup, no dashboard, free.

10 free audits/day. No account.Every finding is a fact you can verify yourself
6 deterministic checks10 named AI crawlersFree, no signup — 10/day

The Honest Frame

A GEO score measures eligibility, never a guaranteed citation

This audit space isn't empty — dashboards like Web Aloha, Stackra, Siftly and a crowded field of llms.txt checkers already do a version of this. VUST's actual difference is where it lives: no account, no tab to keep open, no email capture. You paste a URL into Telegram and the report comes back in the same chat, capped at 10 free audits a day.

Six deterministic checks you can verify yourself, plus AI drafts clearly labeled as drafts — never a ranking promise.

What one check catches

Three of the six Tier-1 checks, and the concrete difference between failing and passing them.

AI-crawler access

Invisible to AI answers

robots.txt has "User-agent: PerplexityBot\nDisallow: /" — quietly added months ago, never revisited.

Readable

No disallow rule for PerplexityBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, GPTBot or CCBot — the audit names the exact line, or confirms none exists.

Structured data

Nothing to parse

Zero <script type="application/ld+json"> blocks on the page, or a block that fails JSON.parse silently.

Machine-readable

Valid FAQPage or Article JSON-LD present — the audit lists which @type values it actually found, and which recommended types are missing.

Answer-block presence

Buried

The page's actual answer sits in paragraph six, under three paragraphs of scene-setting.

Liftable

A concise 1–3 sentence answer sits near the top — the exact chunk an AI answer engine can quote without reading the whole page.

Illustrative example

What a sample audit report looks like

This is a fictional page's report to show the SHAPE of the output — a mix of passes and fails, exactly how the real bot returns it. It is not a real vust.ai audit result; run your own URL through @vustSEObot to see an actual one.

example.com/blog/some-guide55/100 GEO-readiness
  • AI-crawler access

    PerplexityBot blocked by "Disallow: /blog/" — ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, GPTBot, CCBot all allowed.

  • Structured data

    Article + BreadcrumbList JSON-LD found and valid. FAQPage missing (recommended).

  • Answer-block presence

    No concise lead answer detected — the page opens with a 4-sentence intro before the first fact.

  • Chunkability

    6 H2s, 3 phrased as questions, FAQ section detected.

  • Freshness + basics

    Title, meta description and canonical present. No dateModified found.

  • llms.txt

    GET /llms.txt returned 404 — not present at the domain root.

Sample Tier-2 suggestion (AI draft, review before use)

Answer-block draft to paste as the opening paragraph: "This guide covers X in three steps: [step 1], [step 2], [step 3] — each explained below with the specifics most people search for."

Plus 4 suggested FAQ Q&A pairs with ready FAQPage JSON-LD, and a short list of related sub-topics the page doesn't cover yet — every Tier-2 item is a draft to edit, not a fact to publish as-is.

02·Practical use cases

Who runs a free GEO audit

Content/SEO teams

Check whether a page is actually blocked from PerplexityBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, GPTBot, CCBot or the other named AI crawlers before assuming a citation problem is a content problem.

The exact robots.txt line, or confirmation that all 10 named crawlers are allowed — a fact, not a guess.

Bloggers and solo publishers

Get a mechanical read on whether a post has the structured data, answer-block and FAQ shape AI answers actually lift.

A transparent, itemized score plus a ranked list of what to fix first.

Devs shipping a new page

Run a pre-launch check for llms.txt, JSON-LD validity and basic freshness meta before the page goes live.

Six deterministic checks, each independently verifiable in the page's own HTML.

Anyone who wants a draft fix, not just a diagnosis

Get an AI-suggested answer-block rewrite and FAQ Q&A with ready JSON-LD for a page that's structurally weak.

Copy-paste drafts clearly labeled as suggestions to edit, never facts to publish as-is.

03·How it works

Six deterministic checks, plus AI-suggested drafts

011. AI-crawler access

Parses robots.txt + meta-robots and checks named crawlers by user-agent — PerplexityBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, GPTBot, CCBot among others — reporting each as allowed or blocked individually, quoting the deciding rule.

022. Structured data

Parses every JSON-LD block on the page, flags which schema types (FAQPage, Article, Product, HowTo, Organization) are present, missing or invalid — a broken block that silently does nothing is called out by name.

033. Answer-block presence

Checks whether a concise, direct answer sits near the top of the page, or whether it's buried under several paragraphs of intro before the first fact.

044. Chunkability

Reads heading structure — H1/H2 phrased as questions or entities, FAQ sections, paragraph and list density — the shape that makes a page easy for an AI answer engine to lift cleanly.

055. Freshness + basics

Confirms dateModified, title, meta description and canonical tag are present and reasonable length — the basics answer engines still read.

066. llms.txt

Checks whether GET {domain}/llms.txt returns 200 at the domain root.

07Then: AI-suggested drafts (Tier-2)

An LLM reads the page and drafts a rewritten answer-block, 3-5 FAQ Q&A pairs with ready FAQPage JSON-LD, and a short list of entity/topic gaps — always labeled suggestions, never guarantees.

04·Same tool · in Telegram

Telegram

Run your free GEO audit now

@vustSEObot · Paste any URL into @vustSEObot and get the six-check report back in the same Telegram chat — free, no signup.

05·Quality & trust

Honest about what this measures

A score is eligibility, never a citation guarantee

The composite score is a transparent sum of the six checkable Tier-1 items, with the full breakdown shown — it measures whether the page is structured to be citable, not a ranking and not a promise ChatGPT or Perplexity will actually cite it.

This space isn't empty — the wedge is where it lives

GEO-audit checkers already exist as web dashboards (llms.txt checkers alone are a crowded sub-niche). VUST's real difference: no signup, no email, no dashboard tab — paste a URL into Telegram, get the report in the same chat.

Tier-1 facts vs. Tier-2 drafts, always labeled

Every Tier-1 finding quotes something you can verify yourself (the robots.txt line, the missing schema type). Tier-2 output is explicitly a draft to review and edit, never a fact and never a ranking claim.

Free-only, fail-open, no batch mode yet

10 audits/day per user, no paid tier exists. A system error never blocks you. There's no whole-site crawl and no live citation probe yet — one URL at a time, today.

Frequently asked questions

Ready when you are

Is your page visible to AI search?

Six deterministic checks plus AI-suggested fixes — free, in Telegram, 10 audits a day, no signup.