Your Dating Profile, Reviewed in Private.

No. @vustCharmBot's critique is a private, one-to-one AI read of your photo — there's no voter pool, no public gallery, no strangers rating you. The photo bytes are used only for the length of the vision call and then discarded; they are never stored.

It's a real sample: 3 strengths, 3 concrete improvements, and a 1-10 presentation score, exactly like a paid photo would get. The catch is scope — one photo, one time. It's per person for life, not a daily reset, so use it on your strongest candidate photo.

Up to 3 photos plus your bio, read together in one pass: a ranking of which photo should lead and why, specific fixes per photo, a rewritten bio in playful and sincere versions (each capped at 300 characters), and 3 opener templates. The audit is $1.25, and the price is stated up front when the audit is offered. The charge lands only once your bio arrives — the moment every input is collected — not at the start of the flow and not per photo; there is no separate confirm button in between. Send as many of the 3 photos as you like beforehand and nothing is charged.

No — and this is a hard rule, not a preference. Every critique is scoped to presentation only: lighting, angle, crop, background, expression. It never comments on body shape, weight, or attractiveness, and it never uses pickup-artist framing. If a critique ever crossed that line, that would be a bug, not a feature.

They're never stored. Photo bytes exist in memory only for the duration of the AI's read, then they're gone. What persists is a compact text summary (score, strengths, improvements) tied to your session — never the image itself, never a raw transcript of your bio.

A friend is honest but slow to reach and often too polite to name specifics. This gives you the same kind of style feedback — instantly, privately, and precise about what to fix (this exact photo's lighting, this exact bio's tone) — without asking someone to sit through your whole photo roll.