See The Source · Cross-Check The Claim
AI Search That Shows Where Each Claim Comes From.
@vustSearchBot answers with openable, numbered source links and inline [N] citations tied to specific statements — so you can click through to the evidence behind a sentence. Want a gut-check on a contested number? The Second Opinion Council inside @vustbot asks three independent models the same question and flags where they disagree. Cardless, in Telegram.
Two surfaces, kept honest
Sources from Search — disagreement flags from the Council
These are two distinct tools, and we don't blur them. @vustSearchBot gives openable source links and inline [N] citations tied to specific statements — real per-claim provenance. The Council of Sages inside @vustbot compares three whole answers (Claude Sonnet 4.6, Grok 4.3, Gemini 3.1 Pro) and flags where they diverge — that's answer-level agree/disagree, and it does NOT attach web source links. Use Search when you need clickable evidence; use the Council when you want to know whether independent models actually agree.
See the difference
A source-free chat answer, versus a cited answer plus a 3-model cross-check.
02·Practical use cases
See the source, then check if the models agree
Researchers & fact-checkers
Need to know which sentence in an AI answer is actually grounded
@vustSearchBot returns openable, numbered source links with inline [N] citations tied to specific statements — click straight through to the evidence behind a claim.
Anyone weighing a contested number
One model sounds confident, but you're not sure it's right
The Council of Sages inside @vustbot asks Claude Sonnet 4.6, Grok 4.3 and Gemini 3.1 Pro the same question and a Claude arbiter flags AGREED vs DISAGREED — the contested stat gets marked, not buried.
Cardless users
Want cited search and a second opinion without a foreign card
Both run in Telegram on Telegram Stars — no card, no subscription to start. Search for sources, Council for cross-model consensus.
03·How it works
How the source check and cross-check work today
Send your question. The answer comes back with inline [N] markers next to specific sentences and a numbered list of openable source links underneath — Perplexity Direct, across Quick, Standard, Deep and Lab tiers.
Each [N] maps to a link you can click and read — real per-claim provenance, so you verify a sentence instead of trusting a source-free paragraph.
For a contested claim, run it through the Council inside @vustbot: three independent models answer the same question and a Claude arbiter returns AGREED and DISAGREED sections, flagging exactly where they diverge.
04·Same tool · in Telegram
Telegram
Cited search + a 3-model second opinion
@vustSearchBot · Open @vustSearchBot for answers with openable [N] sources; for a cross-check on a contested claim, use the Council inside @vustbot.
05·Quality & trust
Two surfaces, kept honest
Per-claim sources — that's Search
@vustSearchBot gives openable numbered links plus inline [N] citations tied to statements. This is where clickable, per-claim evidence comes from.
Answer-level agree/disagree — that's the Council
The Council compares three whole answers (Claude Sonnet 4.6, Grok 4.3, Gemini 3.1 Pro) and flags divergence. It's answer-level consensus, not per-claim provenance — and it does NOT attach web source links. We won't blur the two.
Use the right tool for the job
Need clickable evidence behind a sentence? Search. Want to know whether independent models actually agree before you rely on a number? Council. They're complementary, not the same feature.
Frequently asked questions
Search and cross-check on one wallet.
Ready when you are
Trust the answer you can trace.
Get openable, cited sources from @vustSearchBot — then flag where three independent models disagree with the Second Opinion Council in @vustbot. Cardless, in Telegram.